Many of these companies have resisted calls to change their questionable branding for decades, but Allen Adamson, co-founder of the New York-based branding consulting firm Metaforce, says changing consumer culture and the power of social media have made it impossible for the companies not to evolve.
“When PepsiCo made the move with Aunt Jemima based on the heightened awareness and the Black Lives Matter movement, it became untenable for the other large companies to say we’re not going to do the same,” Adamson said.
The breakfast foods aisle isn’t the only section of the grocery store with problematic imagery. Here’s a short list of other brands that have been criticized for their logos.
After Colgate-Palmolive purchased the company in the 1980s, it changed the brand name to Darlie and altered the black and white image on its packaging. But critics have been crying foul about Darlie for decades.
“For more than 35 years, we have been working together to evolve the brand, including substantial changes to the name, logo and packaging,” Colgate-Palmolive told CNN Business in a written statement. “We are currently working with our partner to review and further evolve all aspects of the brand, including the brand name.”
The Washington Redskins
The US capital-based NFL franchise with a notoriously racist name did not respond to requests for comment on whether it plans to change its monicker now that others like it have done so.
The United Fruit Company, now known as Chiquita Brands International, first introduced its mascot, Miss Chiquita, to the world in 1944, according to the company’s website.
The so-called “first lady of fruit” was originally a cartoon banana that appeared in ads and on the company’s labels. She wore a fruit hat, frilly clothes, sang popular jingles and looked an awful lot like Brazilian Hollywood icon Carmen Miranda, who reached the height of her own fame around the same time Miss Chiquita was born.
In 1987, Pink Panther creater Oscar Grillo drew Miss Chiquita as an actual woman, a likeness currently used in the company’s branding.
“The change reflected the image the public had of Miss Chiquita as a real person,” the company says on its website.
Miss Chiquita has been criticized for perpetuating stereotypes of Latin Americans as primitive and Latina women as hypersexual.
“Chiquita Banana personifies a colonialist idea of the tropics as a place of simplicity and abundance, and her characterization as fun and carefree is particularly insulting considering the realities of banana production, which are anything but,” the organization says.
Chiquita brands has not responded to requests for comment about whether it plans to change its logo.