Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, violated campaign finance policies by applying donor resources to boost his book, a watchdog alleged Wednesday in two ethics issues.

The Marketing campaign Legal Heart, or CLC, accused Cruz’s marketing campaign committee of shelling out up to $18,000 in late 2020 on Facebook adverts that “exclusively” urged viewers to get copies of the senator’s ebook. These ads provided one-way links to buy the e book from third-party on the internet booksellers, stated the CLC, a nonprofit firm that seeks transparency in govt.

“Mainly because Cruz gets royalties from e-book product sales, his campaign crossed a authorized line by investing donor funds on Fb adverts marketing income of that guide,” mentioned Brendan Fischer, CLC director of federal reform, in a press launch saying the issues.

But Chris Gober, an legal professional for Cruz’s campaign committee, mentioned afterwards Wednesday that the senator’s campaign “has carefully followed Federal Election Commission regulations and recommendations when advertising and marketing his e-book.”

Cruz “has not gained any royalties in anyway for these guide income,” Gober reported in that assertion, which was despatched to CNBC by Cruz’s communications director, Erin Perrine.

Fischer questioned that response. “There appears to be no genuine way for Cruz to know how many textbooks ended up obtained as a consequence of these Fb adverts,” he claimed in a phone contact with CNBC, “and as a result it can be impossible to say that Cruz is not getting royalties on the guides bought as a result of the adverts.”

Cruz’s guide offer with Regnery Publishing netted him a $400,000 advance and a 15% royalty on internet revenue of hardcover copies, the CLC’s press release claimed, citing the senator’s economical disclosure report.

The CLC submitted a complaint with the Federal Election Fee, or FEC, in opposition to Cruz’s marketing campaign committee. The watchdog also despatched a letter to the Senate Ethics Committee requesting an investigation into irrespective of whether Cruz broke federal regulation and the chamber’s ethics procedures.

FEC spokesman Christian Hilland informed CNBC that the commission does not remark on pending litigation. The Senate Ethics Committee did not instantly react to a request for comment.

The Senate’s procedures are “crystal very clear about all users, both equally recent and former, staying prohibited from converting federal campaign resources to private use,” Delaney Marsco, CLC’s senior lawful counsel for ethics, mentioned in the press launch.

“Voters ought to be in a position to believe in that when they are donating to political campaigns, they are doing so to support their favored candidate acquire or retain their office environment, not financing their particular endeavors,” Marsco claimed.

The CLC said in its problems that Cruz could have perhaps marketed or procured his e book employing campaign money “with out running afoul of the legislation.” He could have incorporated a modest volume of details on an current marketing campaign web page, the CLC said, or his marketing campaign could have acquired copies of the ebook straight from the publisher to be employed as presents to supporters, if the publisher withheld royalties on individuals copies.

“But Senator Cruz did not do possibly of these items,” the CLC said in its letter to the Senate ethics panel. “As an alternative, Senator Cruz employed marketing campaign money for on line advertisements that solely promoted his reserve, and directed supporters to acquire it from third-celebration booksellers.”

The e book, “Just one Vote Away: How A Single Supreme Courtroom Seat Can Modify Record,” was unveiled in September.

That thirty day period, Cruz’s Fb website page started off jogging advertisements advertising and marketing the book and encouraging supporters to invest in it — applying language such as “purchase your copy today” and “purchase a duplicate, ideal now” — the FEC grievance alleged.

The ads ran amongst Sept. 24 and Oct. 5, the CLC claimed, citing Facebook’s political advert archive. They all included the disclaimer, “Paid for by Ted Cruz for Senate,” according to the CLC.

Fischer noted in the push launch that “we will not know how in depth these violations could possibly be because any similar advertisements that Cruz could have run on platforms other than Facebook or Google are not publicly out there.”

The letter to the Senate Ethics Committee argued that “when elected officials use marketing campaign contributions to advance their private base lines, they compromise the integrity of the political system and undermine the public’s believe in that their political contributions are currently being utilized legally—for marketing campaign applications or in connection with the officeholder’s obligations, not to line the officeholder’s pockets.”

“Senator Cruz has violated main principles of accountable govt by applying campaign funds to advertise the sale of his book,” the CLC’s letter said. “As this kind of, the Ethics Committee must reassure the general public that the Senate enforces its well-set up procedures and legal guidelines that guard versus corruption by conducting a swift investigation to establish and hold Senator Cruz accountable for any ethics violations.”

The CLC very last 7 days submitted a individual FEC grievance, accusing Georgia’s Republican Get together of illegally accepting in-form contributions from a different election-linked nonprofit called Accurate the Vote.